Judge Dismisses Class Action Accusing Nike of Greenwashing | qzlid.com
HomeLegal NewsJudge Dismisses Class Action...

Judge Dismisses Class Action Accusing Nike of Greenwashing

The Nike logo seen in Shanghai.
A class-action lawsuit against Nike accusing it of greenwashing has been dismissed by a Missouri judge.CREDIT: CFOTO/Future Publishing via Getty Images

A federal court gave the green light to dismiss a class-action lawsuit against Nike last week. 

The athletic wear giant faced accusations over greenwashing in Missouri’s Eastern District Court, filed by lead plaintiff Maria Guadalupe Ellis in May 2023. The complaint alleged that the Beaverton, Ore.-based company had violated the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act (MMPA) by deceiving consumers, misrepresenting products and more. 

The MMPA was designed to protect consumers from misleading and unfair business practices. 

Watch on FN

Ad Loading

00:00

Ellis, who noted she purchased three items from Nike’s sustainability line, alleged that the company “falsely and misleadingly markets the products as ‘sustainable,’ made with ‘sustainable materials,’ and environmentally friendly.” 

Related

Why This Former Nobull Exec and CrossFit Legends Mat Fraser and Brooke Wells Created a New Training Brand

The Nike Air Foamposite One ‘Copper’ Returns in October for the First Time in 7 Years

Bo Jackson’s Legendary Nike Cross-Trainer Is Out Now in Raiders Colors

The complaint, which accuses the company of greenwashing, notes that Nike labels some of its products with phrases like “‘made with recycled fibers’ which ‘reduces our waste and carbon footprint,’” and others bear a circular symbol that “means that the products are made with ‘sustainable’ and environmentally friendly materials.” 

However, Ellis alleged that Nike’s sustainability emblazoned products, in actuality, had no environmental benefits. 

“They are not made with ‘sustainable’ and environmentally friendly materials because the products are not sustainable, and are not made from sustainable and environmentally friendly materials that are less harmful to the environment,” the complaint read. “The marketing and labeling deceives consumers into believing that they are receiving products that are ‘sustainable’…but Nike’s products do not live up to these claims.” 

Ellis contended that she—and other class participants—“would not have purchased the products if she had known that they were not sustainable.” 

One of the main cruxes of Ellis’ argument proved to be around Nike’s use of recycled materials. 

She alleged that “Of the 2,452 Nike ‘Sustainability’ Collection products identified [in the lawsuit], only 239 products are actually made with recycled materials. Thus, more than 90 percent of the Nike ‘Sustainability’ Collection products are not ‘made with recycled fibers.’”

The complaint also took aim at Nike for using recycled polyester and nylon, both of which are plastic-based synthetics. The plaintiff alleged that neither of those materials are sustainable and cause palpable harm to the environment because of the shedding of microplastics and the limited lives of recycled fibers. 

Ultimately, though, Ellis’ arguments failed to persuade Judge Matthew Schelp that the case should see trial. 

In the memorandum and order to dismiss the case, Schlep wrote the following in reference to Ellis’ claims around recycled fibers: “How does she know this to be true? She does not say…She makes no mention of any testing or analysis. She says nothing about how their look or feel might indicate their makeup. She puts forth no allegations surrounding the supplier of defendants’ materials. She claims nothing about the manufacturing process. She details no inside knowledge from, say, a whistleblower, for example, who has come forward on this alleged massive corporate lie.” 

He went on to conclude that an exhibit the plaintiff submitted to the court detailing the material makeups of certain products “is silent on whether the products contain or do not contain recycled material or organic material. That is, it does not say that the polyester [or materials] in these products was or was not virgin or was or was not recycled.” 

Schelp concludes that the allegations are conclusory and that Ellis also failed to adequately describe the nature of the advertisements, labels and marketing from Nike that allegedly convinced her to purchase the products. 

Nike isn’t the only company that has recently skirted legal trouble over greenwashing claims.

Greenwashing cases against major brands have seemingly had a tough time making it to trial. In December, plaintiffs voluntarily dropped a class-action greenwashing suit against H&M. In May of last year, the Swedish company also won dismissal of a separate greenwashing case against it. 

Nike did not return Sourcing Journal’s request for comment.

- A word from our sponsors -

spot_img

Most Popular

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

More from Author

Nike Claims Small Sneaker Designer Is a ‘Bootlegger’ in New Trademark Infringement Lawsuit

Nike’s persistent pursuit of protecting its intellectual property continues to hold...

Nike Denied ‘Footware’ Trademark as It Seeks to Add More Tech Elements to Shoes

Updated on Feb. 28 at 11:54 am. The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board halted Nike’s...

Puma Loses Sneaker Patent Dispute Due to Rihanna Social Media Post

A decade-old Instagram post by music, makeup and fashion mogul Rihanna has cost Puma a...

Dr. Martens Alleges Temu Is Paying to Manipulate Google Search Results in New Trademark Lawsuit

Dr. Martens has filed a new lawsuit against Temu for infringing its trademarks, according...

- A word from our sponsors -

spot_img

Read Now

Nike Claims Small Sneaker Designer Is a ‘Bootlegger’ in New Trademark Infringement Lawsuit

Nike’s persistent pursuit of protecting its intellectual property continues to hold strong in 2024, as the athletic giant files its latest trademark infringement lawsuit this week. In a new complaint filed in US District Court in New Jersey on Thursday, Nike is calling Naadier Riles, the founder of Global Heartbreak,...

Nike Denied ‘Footware’ Trademark as It Seeks to Add More Tech Elements to Shoes

Updated on Feb. 28 at 11:54 am. The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board halted Nike’s attempt to secure a U.S. trademark registration for the term “Footware” following an opposition by San Antonio Shoes on Monday. According to documents from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, San Antonio Shoes argued that “footware” is merely a...

Puma Loses Sneaker Patent Dispute Due to Rihanna Social Media Post

A decade-old Instagram post by music, makeup and fashion mogul Rihanna has cost Puma a patent on one of its sneaker styles. An EU court ruled against the German sportswear brand in a patent dispute last week, saying that the 2016 registration of a sneaker design was invalid because Rihanna had worn the shoe...

Dr. Martens Alleges Temu Is Paying to Manipulate Google Search Results in New Trademark Lawsuit

Dr. Martens has filed a new lawsuit against Temu for infringing its trademarks, according to a report from The Sunday Times. According to The Times, the British bootmaker alleged in a new lawsuit filed last week at the UK’s High Court that the Chinese marketplace paid to manipulate Google searches so that...

Skechers Accuses American Exchange Group of Infringing on ‘Scalloped Opening’ Shoe Designs

Skechers is accusing another shoe company of copying one its protected shoe designs. The comfort footwear brand on Tuesday filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court in California that alleged that American Exchange Apparel Group (AEG) infringed on Skechers’ patents related to its “Scalloped Opening” shoe designs, a...

Bape Agrees to Discontinue Some Sneaker Models Following Nike Trademark Lawsuit Settlement

Nike has settled its trademark infringement lawsuit against Japanese streetwear brand Bape. According to a stipulated dismissal filed in New York’s Southern District Court on April 29, Nike and Bape said that they have entered into a settlement agreement in resolution of their year-long legal battle over look-alike shoe designs...

Thom Browne Wins Another Round in Court With Adidas on the Use of Stripes

Thom Browne won again in his battle with Adidas over the use of stripes on his garments. On Friday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit said it would not overturn the jury verdict reached in January of 2023 that found Browne’s use of four stripes and its grosgrain ribbon did not...

Amazon CEO Violated Labor Laws with Anti-Union Comments, NLRB Rules

A National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) judge ruled Wednesday that Amazon CEO Andy Jassy violated federal labor laws for making comments emphasizing some downsides of unionization in select media appearances in 2022. In the ruling, Judge Brian Gee identified statements made by Jassy on CNBC’s television program “Squawk Box,” and during two summits organized...

Former Employee Claims Nike Does Not Accommodate Nursing Mothers in New Lawsuit

A former Nike employee has filed a class action lawsuit against the company claiming it does not accommodate postpartum and breastfeeding female employees in California who need to pump breastmilk while at work. In the lawsuit filed Wednesday in the Superior Court of the State of California, former Nike employee Fantasia McDonald...

Toms Sues ‘Unauthorized’ Marketplace Resellers for Trademark Infringement

Toms is placing extra emphasis on the ‘TM’ in its name with a new trademark-related legal complaint. The shoe company is suing Amazon seller Bloom Trading Inc. and Arsanious Youssef, its CEO, in California’s Central District Court over alleged trademark infringement and unfair competition. In the complaint, filed June 5, Toms...

Nike and Converse Crack Down on Alleged Counterfeiters in Major New Lawsuit

The Swoosh is cracking down on websites and other platforms trying to replicate its iconic designs. Nike and Converse last week filed a lawsuit against more than 100 defendants alleging the “intentional, unauthorized and unlawful use” of Nike Inc.’s trademarks via the advertising and sale of counterfeit goods. In the suit, which was filed...

Goyard Says The Shoe Surgeon Infringed on Designs in New Lawsuit

French fashion label Goyard is coming after sneaker customizer The Shoe Surgeon in a new lawsuit. In a suit filed in the Central District of California last week, the French brand claimed that The Shoe Surgeon used designs that were identical, indistinguishable from, or confusingly similar to Goyard’s protected designs without the brand’s consent. The...